Map sizes, 44-54? Medium category
  • 3 posts
  • Page 1 of 1
Axobongo wrote:
We don’t have many maps between 42-52 territories.

I would call those size maps medium.. (medium large)
Sometimes medium maps are a little on the small side.

We do have more large maps than medium maps. So I would also recommend moving up the category of Medium to 54 territories.

But also, I want to ask map makers to consider 42-52 territory map making.
  I very much suspect these maps, a little bit bigger than the Classic map, may be the optimal size map for many players, for many reasons. But we will know for sure once we have them, as for now, we lack those between 42-52.
“Man plans, Dice & Cards laugh” ~ Axo
Hoodlum wrote:
Axobongo
We don’t have many maps between 42-52 territories.

I would call those size maps medium.. (medium large)
Sometimes medium maps are a little on the small side.

We do have more large maps than medium maps. So I would also recommend moving up the category of Medium to 54 territories.

But also, I want to ask map makers to consider 42-52 territory map making.
I very much suspect these maps, a little bit bigger than the Classic map, may be the optimal size map for many players, for many reasons. But we will know for sure once we have them, as for now, we lack those between 42-52.

By design not coincidence. This is/(was?) the reason you don't see those size maps atm. DXII Guide to Map Making

an excerpt from DXII Guide to Map Making (click to show)
Hoodlum is online.
Dima wrote:
But theoretically maps of 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 and 44 territories are allowed, right? I just read this thread once again and realiszed that the new germany map has more territories than allowed (47 if i did not misscalculated), so guess i ll need to make some changes.

"vorple: the real strategy comes when you cant just win cuz you got lucky and got the big card stack"